Haskell GHC programs versus OCaml by benchmark task performance mandelbrot source secs mem gz cpu cpu load Haskell GHC 11.66 38,588 782 46.53 100% 100% 100% 100% OCaml 55.18 2,900 444 55.17 0% 1% 0% 100% spectral-norm source secs mem gz cpu cpu load Haskell GHC 4.05 3,960 987 15.71 100% 97% 97% 95% OCaml 4.31 5,280 914 15.97 92% 94% 93% 92% fannkuch-redux source secs mem gz cpu cpu load Haskell GHC 15.41 3,280 1113 60.92 99% 98% 100% 100% OCaml 16.12 ? 1017 ? 100% 100% 100% 100% n-body source secs mem gz cpu cpu load Haskell GHC 21.91 4,068 1883 21.91 100% 1% 0% 0% OCaml 21.67 1,588 1251 21.67 61% 1% 0% 39% reverse-complement source secs mem gz cpu cpu load Haskell GHC 5.85 501,324 1020 7.82 13% 8% 100% 13% OCaml 3.73 ? 1368 ? 56% 62% 55% 58% fasta source secs mem gz cpu cpu load Haskell GHC 9.56 5,164 969 10.09 100% 2% 2% 3% OCaml 6.00 199,732 1189 5.99 0% 2% 100% 0% k-nucleotide source secs mem gz cpu cpu load Haskell GHC 40.22 523,084 1059 141.80 91% 88% 88% 87% OCaml 21.63 255,436 1833 57.55 47% 39% 94% 89% binary-trees source secs mem gz cpu cpu load Haskell GHC 25.13 711,956 494 52.23 91% 37% 36% 45% OCaml 10.03 115,968 751 30.17 89% 89% 82% 44% regex-redux source secs mem gz cpu cpu load Haskell GHC Make Error OCaml 0.23 1,876 637 0.20 92% 0% 12% 5% pidigits source secs mem gz cpu cpu load Haskell GHC Make Error OCaml Make Error Haskell GHC The Glorious Glasgow Haskell Compilation System, version 8.4.1 OCaml The OCaml native-code compiler, version 4.06.0 vs C vs C++ vs Java vs OCaml